AWS DMS VS Qlik

AWS Database Migration Service (DMS) was introduced as a tool to help migrate legacy databases into AWS. While it supports full-load and CDC replication, DMS is not a modern integration platform. It lacks support for modern SaaS APIs, streaming destinations, and developer-friendly deployment models.

• Available in AWS: Works within AWS without provisioning servers.
• Basic CDC support: Handles incremental replication from supported databases.

• Not real-time: DMS is not a streaming system. Latency varies and is hard to monitor in production.
• No extensibility: No community ecosystem, no custom connectors, no plugin support.
• Operational overhead: Task failures are common and require manual troubleshooting. Configuration and credential management are fragile.
• Rigid delivery options: Cannot deliver to modern analytics stacks or streaming endpoints.
• Expensive at scale: Costs add up with replication instance hours, storage, and logging. Lacks predictability for long-term CDC jobs.

Costs are based on replication instance size and duration (e.g., t3.medium ~$0.036/hr), plus storage and logs. Tasks that run continuously or process high volumes can become costly without offering the capabilities of modern platforms. There is no free tier, and pricing becomes opaque with additional monitoring and retries.

Qlik is a legacy enterprise vendor known for BI and dashboarding. Its Qlik Replicate product (formerly Attunity) enables database replication using full load and log-based CDC, primarily into data warehouses like Snowflake and Synapse.

While mature in legacy environments, Qlik lacks support for streaming-first architectures, modern SaaS APIs, and developer-friendly workflows.

• CDC support: Mature log-based replication from enterprise databases.
• Strong in SAP/Mainframe: One of few vendors with support for complex legacy systems.

• Legacy-first architecture: No native support for streaming, APIs, or lakehouse targets.
• High complexity: Requires separate tools (e.g. Qlik Compose) for transforms, orchestration, or monitoring.
• Limited extensibility: Closed ecosystem. No SDK or community for custom connectors.
• Not built for the cloud: Self-managed option is brittle. SaaS version is fragmented.
• Opaque pricing: Requires contract negotiations. Difficult to evaluate TCO up front.

Pricing is enterprise-only, opaque, and often varies by reseller. Customers pay per core or task for Qlik Replicate, and additional fees for Qlik Compose and Qlik Cloud. Expect significant licensing and infrastructure overhead for full deployments.

Estuary was founded in 2019. But the core technology, the Gazette open source project, has been evolving for a decade within the Ad Tech space, which is where many other real-time data technologies have started.

Estuary Flow is the only real-time and ETL data pipeline vendor in this comparison. There are some other ETL and real-time vendors in the honorable mention section, but those are not as viable a replacement for Fivetran. Estuary Flow is also a great option for batch sources and targets.

Where Estuary Flow really shines is in any combination of change data capture (CDC), real-time and batch ETL or ELT, and loading multiple destinations with the same pipeline. Estuary Flow currently is the only vendor to offer a private cloud deployment, which is the combination of a dedicated data plane deployed in a private customer account that is managed as SaaS by a shared control plane. It combines the security and dedicated compute of on-prem with the simplicity of SaaS.

CDC works by reading record changes written to the write-ahead log (WAL) that records each record change exactly once as part of each database transaction. It is the easiest, lowest latency, and lowest-load for extracting all changes, including deletes, which otherwise are not captured by default from sources. Unfortunately ELT vendors like Airbyte, Fivetran, Meltano, and Hevo all rely on batch mode for CDC. This puts a load on a CDC source by requiring the write-ahead log to hold onto older data. This is not the intended use of CDC and can put a source in distress, or lead to failures.

Estuary Flow has a unique architecture where it streams and stores streaming or batch data as collections of data, which are transactionally guaranteed to deliver exactly once from each source to the target. With CDC it means any (record) change is immediately captured once for multiple targets or later use. Estuary Flow uses collections for transactional guarantees and for later backfilling, restreaming, transforms, or other compute. The result is the lowest load and latency for any source, and the ability to reuse the same data for multiple real-time or batch targets across analytics, apps, and AI, or for other workloads such as stream processing, or monitoring and alerting.

Estuary Flow also has broad packaged and custom connectivity, making it one of the top ETL tools. It has 150+ native connectors that are built for low latency and/or scale. While this number may seem low, these are high-quality, standardized connectors. In addition, Estuary is the only vendor to support Airbyte, Meltano, and Stitch connectors, which easily adds 500+ more connectors. Getting official support for the connector is a quick “request-and-test” with Estuary to make sure it supports the use case in production. Most of these connectors are not as scalable as Estuary-native, Fivetran, or some ETL connectors, so it’s important to confirm they will work for you. Flow’s support for TypeScript and SQL transformations also enables ETL.

• Modern data pipeline: Estuary Flow has the best support for schema drift, evolution, and automation, as well as modern DataOps.
• Modern transforms: Flow is also both low-code and code-friendly with support for SQL and TypeScript (with Python on the way) for ETL, and dbt for ELT.
• Lowest latency: Several ETL vendors support low latency. But of these Estuary can achieve the lowest, with sub-100ms latency. ELT vendors generally are batch only. 
• High scale: Unlike most ELT vendors, leading ETL vendors do scale. Estuary is proven to scale with one production pipeline moving 7GB+/sec at sub-second latency.
• Most efficient: Estuary alone has the fastest and most efficient CDC connectors. It is also the only vendor to enable exactly-and-only-once capture, which puts the least load on a system, especially when you’re supporting multiple destinations including a data warehouse, high performance analytics database, and AI engine or vector database.
• Deployment options: Of the ETL and ELT vendors, Estuary is currently the only vendor to offer open source, private cloud, and public multi-tenant SaaS.
• Reliability: Estuary’s exactly-once transactional delivery and durable stream storage makes it very reliable.
• Ease of use: Estuary is one of the easiest to use tools. Most customers are able to get their first pipelines running in hours and generally improve productivity 4x over time. 
• Lowest cost: For data at any volume, Estuary is the clear low-cost winner in this evaluation. Rivery is second.
• Great support: Customers consistently cite great support as one of the reasons for adopting Estuary.

• On premises connectors: Estuary has 150+ native connectors and supports 500+ Airbyte, Meltano, and Stitch open source connectors. But if you need on-premises app or data warehouse connectivity, make sure you have all the connectivity you need.
• Graphical ETL: Estuary has been more focused on SQL and dbt than graphical transformations. While it does infer data types and convert between sources and targets, there is currently no graphical transformation UI.

Of the various ELT and ETL vendors, Estuary is the lowest total cost option. Estuary only charges $0.50 per GB of data moved from each source or to each target, and $100 per connector per month. Rivery, the next lowest cost option, is the only other vendor that publishes pricing of 1 RPU per 100MB, which is $7.50 to $12.50 per GB depending on the plan you choose. Estuary becomes the lowest cost option by the time you reach the 10s of GB/month. By the time you reach 1TB a month Estuary is 10x lower cost than the rest.