You should reconsider choosing Debezium for streaming Change Data Capture.

Short on time? Here’s the 90-second run-down on why.

  • Debezium is popular and proven at the enterprise level, but it is not ‘set it and forget it.' Common gotchas include:

    • Continuous management of resources and Kafka topics to prevent data loss.
    • Back-logged pipelines and data loss when DML creates change events in the millions over a short time.
    • Is at-least once delivery, so duplicates are created downstream.
    • Backfilling data and partitioning tables for scale is manual.
    • Tables are inaccessible during Debezium snapshotting.
  • There are Debezium alternatives worth considering, both open-source and paid.
  • Estuary Flow is one such open-source or fully-managed option… we describe how we implement CDC to solve some of the above scaling challenges and we think we are pretty…. Pretty… pretty good.
Blog Post Image

Read on for more details!

What is Change Data Capture?

Change Data Capture (CDC) is the process by which you capture all the new events from a source system. Any update, any insert, or other modification to the source database that needs to be ultimately reflected in a downstream application. 

As an example, it would be a really bad experience if we continue to offer Valentine’s gift baskets on our website, when there is actually no inventory. The user may end up breaking up with both the eCommerce site and have a break in their relationship. 

A CDC pipeline will be constructed by data engineers to avoid this potential problem, especially those working in eCommerce, fraud, logistics, and financial services. 

Implementation options range from simply querying the database on a periodic basis (query-based CDC), to complex implementations that stream database changes in real-time. 

What is Debezium? 

Debezium is an open-source distributed framework for creating streaming change data capture pipelines. 

Most often used with the Apache Kafka streaming framework (but not a hard requirement), it enables you to abstract away much of the coding work that would otherwise be required to connect, say, changes in a Postgres database to Kafka. 

For most database connectors (Postgres, MySQL, MongoDB), events are pushed from the write-ahead log into Debezium, which then pushes them downstream into Kafka in real-time, and in the exact order of event generation. For some others (SQL Server), Debezium is ‘polling’ the database.

Debezium is a popular project with over 8K+ Git stars and experiences are documented extensively online. 

The Challenges with Debezium 

Debezium is a popular open-source choice for streaming change data from databases like PostgreSQL, MySQL, and MongoDB into a Kafka topic, and on to downstream consumers. It was one of the first open-source CDC frameworks to gain popularity, and thousands of data teams large and small still choose Debezium and contribute to the project.

But Debezium is also a project with many complications that will require considerable time and effort to overcome when working with it at scale, namely:

debezium alternatives - perception vs reality
1. Debezium and associated packages require specific expertise. Data teams will need to become intimately familiar with Kafka, Kafka Connect, and ZooKeeper to begin standing up CDC pipelines. ZooKeeper itself is fairly heavy and requires a large tech stack. Needless to say, teams will have to be highly proficient in Java to manage the implementation. 

2. Continuous DevOps. It takes continuous work to provision the appropriate amount of CPU resources so data doesn’t get throttled while moving into a Kafka Topic. If data is throttled and the Kafka Topic retention is not set long enough, data may be lost.

3. When working with large tables, performance, availability, and data loss will become an issue. 

There are a few problems that can arise when trying to scale Debezium:

  • When large DML operations occur, it can take many hours to finish the operation. (“Large” here meaning “affecting tens of millions of rows,” which is more common than it might seem).
  • Snapshotting is incremental and without concurrency. Tables with tens of millions of rows will take hours to snapshot. Snapshotting also locks a table from access until complete. 
  • The Postgres connector can manage 7,000 change events per second. You can get to a higher scale and avoid backlogging using partitioning, but that requires you to create multiple connectors for the same table and then re-join all the data again. If the load is unbalanced between tables, one table may have to wait to be processed until the first larger operation finishes.
  • It takes time to spin up or turn down a new connector as there is no ‘hot standby’ in Kafka Connect.
  • Logical decoding plug-ins like wal2json can run out of memory 

4. Debezium provides At-least Once Delivery vs. Exactly-Once. You’ll likely have to implement reduction at the consumer level to prevent duplicates in the log and thus in downstream consumers.

5. Complex schema changes and migrations are manualDebezium will propagate row-level changes  into the Kafka topic (provided it isn’t currently snapshotting), but more complex schema changes will have to be manually managed. 

For example:

  • If the primary key is changed, Debezium will need to be stopped and the database will need to be put into read-only mode and then turned back on.
  • If the DDL is modified in Postgres, no change will be alerted to downstream consumers.

6. Backfills are manual. If you have to spin up a new consumer that needs both historical and real-time change events, unless the data is being retained in a Kafka log forever (cost inefficient) or the topic can be compacted sufficiently, then you will have to manually trigger backfills

7. Transformations are limited. Debezium and Kafka enable single message transforms. This is powerful for formatting a message (for example, to modify a timestamp or change type) as it flows to the topic and some other scenarios. However, the limitation is in the name; the transform only applies to the single message as it flows to the topic. For more complex transformations like streaming joins, splitting a message, or applying a transformation against the whole dataset, a secondary system like Flink will be needed.

If none of the above fazes you, and the team has the time and resources to take on the challenge above, great! Just note that for teams working with very high volume datasets, it’s not uncommon that companies like Netflix, Robinhood, and WePay to have to allocate 4-6 full-time data professionals just to deal with Debezium. 

All hope is not lost of course, and we don’t want to point out problems without pointing out some alternatives. So we won’t stay in this sphere of negativity. 

There are many alternatives to Debezium for real-time replication of change events from a database to the cloud warehouse or beyond. Choices range across open-source and third-party vendors. 

Alternatives to Debezium

The table below is a high-level round-up of popular, real-time CDC tools that are alternatives to Debeziu. Before you dive in, a few notes and caveats:

  • We can’t be experts on every solution, and we don’t claim to be! So while the table doesn’t go into great technical detail, it does cover major characteristics of each Debezium alternative.
  • There are more solutions than listed here. For simplicity, we omitted tools that:

    • Are purely enterprise-focused, such as Qlik, Talend, and GoldenGate.
    • Are native and confined to a specific cloud ecosystem, such as Amazon DMS and Google Datastream. 
    • In general, anything that lacks self-serve developer access.
SolutionOpen-Source / PaidCompany SummaryAdvantages / Disadvantages
Estuary FlowHybridOpen-source connectors and fully managed no-code connectors for real-time CDC. Startup launched in 2019 and creators of Gazette streaming framework

+Fully managed no-code or open-source

+In-flight SQL transforms 

+Exactly-Once delivery

-No on-prem

Confluent CloudHybridCompany created by founders of Apache Kafka offering fully-managed Debezium. Provide a no-code UI with sinks and sources for Kafka.

+Fully managed no-code

+On-cloud or on-prem
-At-least Once delivery

-Requires Kafka usage

StriimPaidFully-managed no-code connectors for both on-prem and cloud

+Fully managed no-code
+Exactly-Once delivery
+Available in Cloud marketplaces

-Requires windowing on joins


ArcionPaidFully managed no-code connectors for on-prem. Founded in 2018 for helping with on-prem real-time database replication. 


+Exactly-Once delivery

-No ability to transform data

-Few connectors for cloud as mostly an on-prem solution

HVR (Fivetran)PaidReal-time data replication company acquired by Fivetran in 2021. Focused on on-prem replication.


+Exactly-Once delivery

+Available in cloud marketplaces

-No support for Cloud

-No dev trial 

Apache NifiOpen-SourceOpen-source real-time replication project with drivers for Postgres and MySQL



-Not widely used

-Doesn’t scale well





Estuary Flow as a Debezium Alternative

Allow me to do a quick introduction before getting into the nitty-gritty details of how we fully manage a streaming CDC implementation, and in our humble view, make up for some of the inherent shortcomings of Debezium that require intervention.

Estuary Flow is a data operations platform for building and transforming streaming data pipelines. We offer open-source as well as fully managed connectors so you can ingest data in real time. 

Estuary writes its own open-source connectors for each database. These connectors use the same mechanism as Debezium (pull from write ahead or transaction log) to avoid hammering the production database. Flow is built on top of the open-source Gazette distributed pub-sub streaming framework. Data flows from the write-ahead log connector and is ingested into a real-time data lake of JSON files that store both batch and real-time data.

Estuary Flow vs. Debezium

debezium alternatives - estuary flow cdc

Estuary provides both open-source connectors as well as no-code platform for creating cloud-based CDC pipelines. 

As a fully managed solution, there is no need for Kafka or managing compute resources. (Note: While it's possible to use Debezium without Kafka, for example, by using Debezium with Kinesis, this is relatively uncommon. By building our CDC on top of Gazette instead of Kafka, we are able to more easily enable more powerful transformations and backfilling while retaining low latency.)

Estuary Flow can also be self-hosted for those willing to take on a bit more management. At a more nuanced technical design level, here is how we implemented CDC to work around some of Debezium’s pitfalls.

  • Exactly-Once Delivery

Estuary Flow connectors run data through the Gazette streaming framework. A benefit of using this framework is that it guarantees exactly-once delivery by de-duplicating messages stored in the real-time data lake of JSON files. The method is described in-depth here

At a high level, each change event has a UUID, timestamp, and clock sequence. Gazette de-duplicates uses a combination of these properties to track the largest clock seen for a given producer. Read messages with smaller clocks are presumed duplicates and are discarded. 

  • Scaling large changes

The challenge with Debezium at scale is that the database will run out of memory while it pulls days from the database log. Estuary Flow’s database connectors properly acknowledge data already consumed to avoid the DML issues when working with millions of rows.

  • Schema Changes

As of April 2023, Estuary Flow validates that any incoming data fits the defined JSON schema. Any data that does not fit the defined schema will be flagged to the user to intervene. 

By the end of May 2023, Estuary Flow will manage any schema changes and migrations end-to-end. Destination schema will be automatically updated to adjust for new incoming data, thus avoiding the manual work otherwise required whenever an upstream table changes. 

  • Backfills

Because Estuary is built on the Gazette streaming framework, all data is stored as a real-time data lake of JSON files that have already been reduced and de-duplicated. Any backfilling of data from a point in time to a given consumer will fully backfill by default and with exactly-once semantics. There is no need to manually replay the log from a selected point in time. 

  • Transforms

Estuary Flow enables more complex transformations than single message transforms (SMT). Any and all real-time or history data ingested into an Estuary collection (the real-time data lake in cloud storage), can be statefully joined or transformed in-flight with SQL. Again this is a function of having a Kappa architecture in which all data stored in the cloud can be cheaply derived upon.

Your next step in streaming Change Data Capture

As noted above, you have many choices across paid and open-source for capturing change data with low latency. Even beyond what is noted, for smaller databases with less strict latency requirements, you could still explore using highly frequent query or trigger-based CDC. Most batch software will only be down to five-minute syncs… which is hardly ‘streaming’. 

We welcome you to use the free up to 10 GB/month  Estuary Flow platform for creating streaming no-code change data capture pipelines from sources like Postgres, MongoDB, MySQL, Salesforce, and more to destinations like Snowflake, S3, Redshift, BigQuery, and more!

debezium alternatives - Estuary Flow connectors

Getting Started!

Use these resources:

Start streaming your data for free

Build a Pipeline